Obama vs McCain – Dirty politics… or Just kids having fun

I came across this video on a republic blog. The video portrays youths training and showcasing their I-heart-Obama routine. Lots of blogs have put this up as democrat propaganda, saying Obama is training the youth with a nazi-youth methodology.

Being a European – who doesn’t have much preference, and who politically might even prefer the Republicans, I want to say that this is absolute nonsense. This video is either 10 guys having a laugh, mocking the Obama-is-gonna-change-the-world campaign, or a severe case of Republican dirt war.

Just stating the obvious- does Obama need to train tha black youths of America to vote for him?????
If that was 10 white kids, then we’d have a problem (but we probably wouldn’t believe it was a real video).

People are so polarised that they immediately latch on to any piece of information that could strengthen their side, without screening it to see if it’s possibly real or not. Unfortunately, we’ve seen this increasingly with riddiculous statements about Obama. We’re also expiriencing it a little with Sarah Palin- but I must confess that I have more concern about the remarks that are real than those that are fake on that front…

Enjoy the video

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Advertisements

McCain-Europe relations questionable- Obama perhaps not!

To be honest I don’t quite know where I stand on the Obama-McCain question. But something tells me that when it comes to Europe, it seems Obama is the candidate that will be more… reliable. Having heard what some have described as Obama’s historic Berlin speech, and then having read “McCain’s Spanish Dancing“, i’m not entirely convinced of the Republican candidate’s… European orientation.

When asked whether McCain would be willing to extend an invitation to the Premiere of Spain (mentioned both by name and country), McCain became confused. It actually seems as if he had no clue about Spain…

Portion of the Interview:

Q: Senator, finally, let’s talk about Spain. If you’re elected president, would you be willing to invite President José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero to the White House, to meet with you?

A: I would be willing to meet with those leaders who are our friends and want to work with us in a cooperative fashion. And by the way, President Calderón of Mexico is fighting a very, very tough fight against the drug cartels. I’m glad we’re now working in cooperation with the Mexican government on the Merida plan, and I intend to move forward with the relations and invite as many of them as I can of those leaders to the White House.

Q: Would that invitation be extended to the Zapatero government? To the president, itself?

A: Uh, I don’t, you know, honestly, I have to look at the relations and the situations and the priorities, but I can assure you: I will establish closer relations with our friends, and I will stand up  to those who want to do harm to the United States of America. I know how to do both.

Q: So, you have to wait and see if he’s willing to, to meet with you, or you be… able to do it? In the White House?

A: Well, again… I, I don’t… All I can tell you is that I have a clear record of working with leaders in the hemisphere that are friends with us, and standing up to those who are not, and that’s judged on the basis of the importance of our relationship with Latin America, and the entire region.

Q: OK, what about Europe? I’m talking about the President of Spain. Are you willing to meet with him, if you’re elected president?

A: I’m willing to meet with any leader who is dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are for human rights, democracy and freedom. And I will stand up to those that do not.

The authors comments (which seem reasonable) were:

McCain’s reluctance to meet with Zapatero was odd because Spain is a member of NATO and a longtime U.S. ally …

We listened to the McCain interview several times and got the impression that the senator was confused during the first few questions. The interviewer says Zapatero’s name quickly and it seemed to us that McCain did not recognize the name. His answer suggests he is focused on other leaders from Latin America. But the interviewer seems to notice his confusion and reminds him “OK, what about Europe? I’m talking about the president of Spain.”

But McCain’s reply does not suggest that registered with him and he offers a more general reply about meeting with “any leader who is dedicated to the same principles and philosophy that we are.”

We would have accepted a McCain-was-confused explanation for this one, but the McCain campaign sent reporters a statement from foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann that said McCain’s answer was intentional.

“The questioner asked several times about Senator McCain’s willingness to meet Zapatero — and id’d him in the question so there is no doubt Senator McCain knew exactly to whom the question referred. Senator McCain refused to commit to a White House meeting with President Zapatero in this interview,” Scheunemann said in an e-mail sent to the Washington Post and CNN.

Scheunemann said that if elected, McCain “will meet with a wide range of allies in a wide variety of venues but is not going to spell out scheduling and meeting location specifics in advance.”

So where does that leave us?

Obama is right that McCain “said the other day that he would not meet potentially with the prime minister of Spain.” McCain’s words make that clear and are reinforced by Scheunemann’s statement.

It’s less clear if McCain “wasn’t sure whether (Spain is) aligned with us.”

To us, McCain seemed confused. But Scheunemann’s statement is adamant that McCain knew the subject was Spain. As a result, his comment that “I have to look at the relations and the situations and the priorities” indicates at least some doubt about U.S.-Spanish relations. So we find Obama’s claim to be Mostly True.”

 

 

 

 

 

See the clip of Obama’s speech in Berlin for comparison. McCain’s rationale, or ignorance is for this European NOT convincing.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine